alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: ALSA devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove email addresses from MODULE_AUTHOR tag
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:12:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4644DC5A.7060905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hd517ich2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>

On 05/11/2007 05:52 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:

>> Following up the recent MODULE_MAINTAINER discussion on LKML:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/4/170
>>
>> that concluded with MODULE_MAINTAINER not being a good idea, here's a patch 
>> that just deletes the email addresses from the MODULE_AUTHOR tags for ALSA.
>>
>> The email address is the problem I was trying to fix; with multiple current 
>> and non-current authors and maintainers who might not even be authors the 
>> address(es) available from the tag confuse the issue of whom to contact. 
>> It's moreover also information that easily outdated.
>>
>> A bit more than half of the tags in the kernel don't include an email 
>> address already (the core contributors typically don't include any) and I'll 
>> submit patches removing more.
> 
> Did we get consensus about this removal action?
> I've seen only one follow up by Krzysztof.
> (I personlly don't mind to remove mail addresses, though.)

Yep, Krysztof was the only one to specifically ACK but seeing as how I asked 
for objections:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/27/488

I took not seeing any as more ACKs. Alan Cox is objecting a bit again though 
preferring the originally proposed MODULE_MAINTAINER:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/10/628

I seem unlikely to convince him but I believe it's upto specific subsystems 
whether or not they'll take patches removing the email adresses from the 
tag, ie, in the case of ALSA upto you and Jaroslav.

I do believe it actually solves a problem. In the end, all that I really 
care about are the ones that I specifically want to take on (which in the 
case of ALSA is eventually most or all of isa/, but I'm not sufficiently 
upto speed yet, and certainly not on the _real_ driver code as opposed to 
the bus glue) but in a global sense, I'd like to just see them all go.

Rene.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-11 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-11  1:08 [PATCH] remove email addresses from MODULE_AUTHOR tag Rene Herman
2007-05-11 15:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2007-05-11 21:12   ` Rene Herman [this message]
2007-05-12 17:01     ` Rene Herman
2007-05-19  1:38       ` Rene Herman
2007-05-19 14:35         ` Takashi Iwai
2007-05-22  9:54           ` Matthias Koenig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4644DC5A.7060905@gmail.com \
    --to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).