From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rene Herman Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove email addresses from MODULE_AUTHOR tag Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:01:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4645F2F4.2010807@gmail.com> References: <4643C20C.8050105@gmail.com> <4644DC5A.7060905@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.201]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47E12459B for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 19:21:04 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4644DC5A.7060905@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: ALSA devel , Jaroslav Kysela List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 05/11/2007 11:12 PM, Rene Herman wrote: > I seem unlikely to convince him but I believe it's upto specific > subsystems whether or not they'll take patches removing the email > adresses from the tag, ie, in the case of ALSA upto you and Jaroslav. For what it's worth, Linus merged the patch removing the advice to include an email address in the MODULE_AUTHOR comment: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=108f39a1b3b1e4b28ca8cc156f06171445499d21 He was aware of Alan's objection. Removing existing ones is ofcourse not quite the same as not introducing new ones though so ofcourse still up to you. I'm still signing off on it... Rene.