From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>
Cc: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@gmail.com>,
Alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cs4231: remove two auto-calibrations during chip initialization
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:26:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EFB5F9.4090909@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0709181305130.8148@tm8103.perex-int.cz>
On 09/18/2007 01:08 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>> On 09/18/2007 12:17 PM, Krzysztof Helt wrote:
>>
>>> From: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
>>>
>>> The initialization function did auto-calibration after each
>>> register setting. This patch merges more register changes
>>> before auto-calibration is done.
>> Seems to make sense but am a little uneasy about these -- someone very much
>> did it this way on purpose originally it seems. Jaroslav, that someone was you
>> I believe? Do you remember anything about this?
>
> If I remember correctly, it was workaround for some CS4231 chips to fix
> the noise audio issue (the chip was not initialized correctly in some
> cases). I would make a whitelist for "non-buggy" tested chips to skip
> double calibration.
Okay thanks. For reference, I have:
AD1848
AD1848KP
AD1845JP
AD1845XP
AD1846JP
CS4248-KL
CS4231
CS4231A-KL
CS4232-KQ
CS4235-XQ3
CS4236B-KQ
CS4237B-XQ3
CS4239-KQ
(Won't be testing right now, but will be generally available).
Rene.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 10:17 [PATCH] cs4231: remove two auto-calibrations during chip initialization Krzysztof Helt
2007-09-18 10:38 ` Rene Herman
2007-09-18 11:08 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2007-09-18 11:26 ` Rene Herman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46EFB5F9.4090909@gmail.com \
--to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=krzysztof.h1@gmail.com \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox