From: Mathieu Monney <zittix_all@xwaves.net>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Hardware and software period size
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:26:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D92B76.8080806@xwaves.net> (raw)
Hi all,
I'm currently developping a layer between ALSA and a VoIP library for an
embedded device. The device cannot have a different period size than
1024 for playback and 8 for capture (I don't know why :-( ). So my
problem is that the VoIP library ask me to have a period size different
of the hardware period size. So I decided to read/write to the sound
device using the provided software period size rather than the hardware
period size.. Is it a good idea? It seems to work but I have some sound
quality issues :-( !
Thank you
Mathieu
reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D92B76.8080806@xwaves.net \
--to=zittix_all@xwaves.net \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox