From: Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@insite.cz>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: MIDI on ice1724 - real-time kernel problem
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 21:12:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <481CB902.9080905@insite.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5htzhgub9a.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:07:42 +0200,
> Pavel Hofman wrote:
>> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> At Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:06:19 +0200,
>>> Pavel Hofman wrote:
>> The code works fine on standard kernel.
>>
>> But in the RT kernel of Ubuntu 7.10 (2.6.22-14-rt, 1000HZ compared to
>> 250HZ of the -generic kernel), MIDI interrupts get thrown continuously,
>> hogging CPU with the IRQXX "process".
>>
>> When playing 44.1kHz audio with buffer size of 32768,
>> snd_vt1724_interrupt is called every 185ms. With the buffer size of
>> 4096, it is every 23ms. So far so good.
>>
>> But when I try to output some midi, the routine gets called every 24us
>> (i.e. 1000 times faster). Comparing the time difference between my
>> several debug printk's in snd_vt1724_interrupt (approx. 5us between each
>> printk record a few lines of code apart) and between each call of the
>> method (24us), I thought there would be a loop somewhere in the
>> interrupt handler calling code. But /proc/interrupts really shows over
>> 40k interrupts a second for ICE1724.
>>
>> Changing the watermarks up to 0x1f makes no difference.
>
> That looks bad.
>
>> Masking the MIDI interrupts works, snd_vt1724_interrupt is called only
>> during VT1724_IRQ_MTPCM interrupts, with the MIDI status bits
>> MPU_TX/MPU_RX set when reading/writing with amidi.
>
> Hm, is it TX or RX, or in both cases?
> Could you check which one (TX or RX) causes this?
>
Both reading (amidi -p hw:0 -d) and writing (amidi -p hw:0 -S
F0411042110C000000000074FF0411042110C000000) starts the TX interrupt
flood (irq status: 0x20) immediately. Upon opening input as well as
output the method snd_mpu401_do_reset is called - is perhaps the culprit
somewhere there?
Thanks,
Pavel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-03 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 20:23 MIDI on ice1724 - preliminary findings and questions Pavel Hofman
2008-04-23 10:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-23 11:08 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-04-23 20:19 ` MIDI on ice1724 - long delays Pavel Hofman
2008-04-24 16:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-24 20:47 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-04-25 6:22 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-25 7:06 ` MIDI on ice1724 - fixing HG Pavel Hofman
2008-04-25 7:10 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-25 7:25 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-04-30 20:07 ` MIDI on ice1724 - real-time kernel problem Pavel Hofman
2008-05-02 12:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-03 19:12 ` Pavel Hofman [this message]
2008-05-07 10:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-08 19:35 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-05-15 7:21 ` Clemens Ladisch
2008-05-15 9:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-18 20:02 ` PATCH - MIDI on ice1724 - real-time kernel problem SOLVED Pavel Hofman
2008-05-20 8:44 ` Clemens Ladisch
2008-05-20 19:15 ` Pavel Hofman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=481CB902.9080905@insite.cz \
--to=pavel.hofman@insite.cz \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox