From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel mailing list <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal for more reliable audio DMA.
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:26:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4407A6.7010909@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910906250720r15a6ee0x79f472da482aa9ec@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/25/2009 08:20 AM, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Robert Hancock<hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 06/24/2009 10:26 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Takashi Iwai<tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>> The problem is knowing which sample in the background music to start
>>>>> mixing the low latency laser blast into.
>>>> That's why querying the accurate hwptr is important in PA.
>>> I'm still not convinced that all of this logic should be exposed to
>>> PA. Exposing these details is what makes ALSA hard to use. We should
>>> be able to better isolate user space from this. If mixing were moved
>>> into the kernel these details could be hidden. The in-kernel code
>>> could then be customized for various sound DMA hardware. This would
>>> also go a long ways toward getting rid of latency issues by removing
>>> the need for real-time response from PA.
>> Mixing really does not belong in the kernel. Moving it there doesn't remove
>> any complication or problem, it just moves it to a different place where
>> it's more difficult to program and less debuggable. Most OSes (Windows
>> included) are moving in the direction of moving mixing out of the kernel,
>> not into it.
>
> Mixing has a real-time component to it. Currently Desktop Linux
> doesn't have real-time support. That's why pulse is developing
> RealTimeKit. Buggy real-time code can easily lock your machine to
> where you need to hit the reset button.
>
> User space code that is locked down with real-time priority and
> servicing interrupts is effectively kernel code, it might as well be
> in the kernel where it can get rid of the process overhead.
>
> http://git.0pointer.de/?p=rtkit.git;a=blob;f=README
Just because it runs with real time priority does not mean it is
effectively kernel code, or that it belongs there. Putting the code into
the kernel adds a bunch of extra challenges for little reason, and also
locks all users into a mixing scheme that may not meet their needs
(ahem, Windows kernel mixer..)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 16:28 Proposal for more reliable audio DMA Mark Brown
2009-06-24 19:07 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-24 21:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-25 4:26 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-25 5:36 ` Robert Hancock
2009-06-25 14:20 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-25 23:26 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2009-06-25 10:25 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-21 2:06 Jon Smirl
2009-06-22 16:27 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2009-06-22 16:43 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-23 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2009-06-24 14:10 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-24 14:39 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-24 15:14 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-24 15:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-24 16:07 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-25 15:26 ` James Courtier-Dutton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4407A6.7010909@gmail.com \
--to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=james.dutton@gmail.com \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox