Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: vbarinov <vbarinov@embeddedalley.com>,
	alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
	mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@analog.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	dg@emlix.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Sedji Gaouaou <sedji.gaouaou@atmel.com>,
	"kyungmin.park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	"Candelaria Villareal, Jorge" <jorge.candelaria@ti.com>,
	ben-linux <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp
Subject: Re: ASoC - Support for multiple components
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:14:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCC6557.1030703@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271686144.3208.305.camel@odin>

Liam Girdwood wrote:
> Currently ASoC is designed around a single CODEC and a single platform
> DMA engine in every sound card instance. This is fine for most embedded
> devices but current smart phone and STB designs are starting to outgrow
> this architecture. 
> 
> I'm currently working on adding ASoC support for multiple different
> CODECs and Platforms (DMA, Audio Engines) into a single sound card
> instance. This work will allow ASoC to support N CODECs and N platforms
> per sound card instance and also allow better integration of audio
> components from GSM MODEMs, BT, FM transceivers and PCM DSPs.

Yea!

> I've now split each ASoC component (i.e. DMA, CODEC, DAI) into driver
> and device structures. This now means each ASoC component is a regular
> kernel device and can have private device data and platform_data. It
> should also provide better support for open firmware and flattened
> device tree.

Yea!

> I've CC'ed folks on this mail who have either contributed or maintain
> ASoC architecture code. Please have a look at your architecture and test
> if you can. I only have access to OMAP and pxa3xx hardware and as such
> have only tested the changes on these two architectures only. I'd
> appreciated anyone else testing on the other architectures too.

I'll take a look at it this week or next.

> The changes are all purely mechanical to component registration and
> component private data only. However, some architectures (txx9, imx,
> s3c) required some extra effort to use the device model as they had (to
> varying degrees) coupled their DMA and DAI code more tightly. The fsl
> platform also required extra work around the open firmware interface.
> Grant/Timur do we still need soc-of-simple now that all components are
> regular devices ?

I've never looked at soc-of-simple before, so I can't say.  Obviously, I've never needed it, and I never planned to use it.

> The code is in my topic/multi-component branch here :-
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lrg/asoc-2.6.git
> 
> It's currently a patch for each component for easier review atm but will
> be rebased into a single commit when it's ready for upstream so it won't
> break bisect.
> 
> If the testing can be done quickly then we can go for 2-6.35 otherwise
> we are looking at 2.6.36.

Ok.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-19 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-19 14:09 ASoC - Support for multiple components Liam Girdwood
2010-04-19 14:14 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2010-04-19 15:15 ` Grant Likely
2010-04-19 16:25   ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-19 17:14     ` Mark Brown
2010-04-19 17:23       ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-19 17:03   ` Mark Brown
2010-04-20  7:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2010-04-20 10:46   ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-21  5:53     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2010-04-21  7:18       ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-21 17:41         ` Mark Brown
2010-04-26 10:49     ` Mark Brown
2010-04-26 11:17       ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-26 14:24         ` Mark Brown
2010-04-26 12:05       ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-26 13:13         ` Mark Brown
2010-04-21 21:07 ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-21 22:13   ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-22 11:27     ` Liam Girdwood
2010-04-22 14:52       ` Timur Tabi
2010-04-22 11:03   ` Liam Girdwood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BCC6557.1030703@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=cliff.cai@analog.com \
    --cc=dg@emlix.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=jorge.candelaria@ti.com \
    --cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net \
    --cc=morimoto.kuninori@renesas.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sedji.gaouaou@atmel.com \
    --cc=vbarinov@embeddedalley.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox