Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Faber <faber@faberman.de>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: RME MADIface 192 kHz problem
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:54:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC15F5C.3010400@faberman.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hlj5qbngq.wl%tiwai@suse.de>

Takashi,

>>>>> What is needed to get this card running at 192 kHz?
>>>> A working driver :)
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/Driver:hdspe
>>> How about posting the patches? :)
>>
>> It would be dozens/hundreds of single patches against the hdspm driver.
> 
> I don't mind any number of patches if they are written logically and
> well readable.
> 
>> I'd rather replace it with the version above.
> 
> If it's more or less compatible with the current driver, it's fine.
> But, one bulk patch is bad.  Even if you replace the driver code,
> split in a logical order, at best.

There are changes everywhere since the old driver inherited a lot of
code from the hdsp driver which in turn inherited a lot of code from
previous drivers. The code was never properly suited to support a
broader range of hardware.

I don't have the time to split up all the changes in all the different
places and if I had the time, I would rather do a complete rewrite (or
better: Finish the rewrite I started a while ago).

>> And I changed one ioctl
>> which would break compatibility - although I doubt anybody used the
>> levelmeter ioctl besides me. The version above is a 'public beta'.
> If it's a new ioctl, it's OK.  We can drop the old (very likely)
> unused ioctl eventually.  But using the same ioctl for different
> behavior is no go.

Ok, dropping the old one in favour of the new one.

>> If the support for the AIO/RayDAT finally works - sure. But for that I
>> still need to tell ALSA somehow that there are n buffers to use, n>2,
>> with n IRQs per buffer cycle.
> Well, actually I forget what your questions are.  Please continue it
> on ML here.
> 
> All other sound drivers work fine with more than two periods, so I
> don't think there is any restriction in the API side.

Ok, the problem was that the AIO/RayDAT have two modes of operation, a
'windows' mode and a 'mac' mode. In the 'windows' mode the full 16k
sample buffer is utilized and the card produces 16k/period_size IRQs
while running through the buffer. I'd need a way to tell ALSA this.
In 'mac' mode it uses a double buffering scheme but only produces one
IRQ per each double buffer walkthru. I understand that ALSA does not
support this mode of operation.


Flo
-- 
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4          x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-22  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-21 13:03 RME MADIface 192 kHz problem Fredrik Lingvall
2010-10-21 14:10 ` Florian Faber
2010-10-21 20:52   ` Takashi Iwai
2010-10-22  5:09     ` Florian Faber
2010-10-22  9:12       ` Takashi Iwai
2010-10-22  9:54         ` Florian Faber [this message]
2010-10-23  9:19           ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC15F5C.3010400@faberman.de \
    --to=faber@faberman.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox