From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Bloniarz Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] theory about CS8247 failed reads Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:39:48 -0800 Message-ID: <4D35DE74.6030307@gmail.com> References: <4D353F23.4020900@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f51.google.com (mail-pw0-f51.google.com [209.85.160.51]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5A3103859 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:39:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so1362101pwj.38 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:39:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 01/18/2011 06:21 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Yes, your fix looks sane (and safe). > I'll queue it up later for 2.6.38 merge. Sounds great, thanks! > The retry-code can be kept for a while as it's basically harmless for > the succeeded case. We can remove it eventually later, but I doubt we > can be 100% sure about such a thing ;) Sure, that makes sense to me. Thanks, -Brian