From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Lai Subject: Re: Question about your DSP topic Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:59:33 -0700 Message-ID: <4D94EB35.4070206@codeaurora.org> References: <4D2652C8.7030701@codeaurora.org> <4D939519.6040506@codeaurora.org> <1301595977.3549.7.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932E91037FB for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:59:36 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1301595977.3549.7.camel@odin> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: alsa-devel , broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > > I've not seen that one yet and we have a similar route on OMAP4. Is it > repeatable 100% or just some of the time. It would also be useful to > post your oops message and I'll take a closer look. > > I'm due to push an squashed update to my dsp branch later tonight in > prep for upstream. Could you also check soc-dsp.c against this copy, it > may be that something that was lost in the backport ? > It's 100% reproducible. I sync to your branch last week so soc-dsp.c should be in sync. Since it's not blocking me, I will wait for your update and see if new change in soc-dsp.c makes any difference Otherwise, I will send you log off line. > Liam > > > _______________________________________________ > Alsa-devel mailing list > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.