From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Remove redundant freq assignment for max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 22:13:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4DE0140E.6050905@ti.com> References: <1306510253.19556.36.camel@phoenix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA17D24466 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 23:13:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1306510253.19556.36.camel@phoenix> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Axel Lin Cc: Peter Hsiang , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Mark Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Hsiang List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 27/05/11 16:30, Axel Lin wrote: > Current implementation set max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk to freq twice. > Set it once is enough, this patch removes the first assignment in case > we may set invalid clock frequency to max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- > hi Peter, > I don't have this hardware handy. Can you help to test it? > Thanks, > Axel > Acked-by: Liam Girdwood