From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Fix SPI driver binding for WM8987 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:28:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4E415204.8020702@ti.com> References: <1312362661-4544-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E41253E.2040407@ti.com> <20110809150503.GE15861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B9A24478 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:28:07 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20110809150503.GE15861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 09/08/11 16:05, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:02PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: >> On 03/08/11 10:11, Mark Brown wrote: >>> As we had no id_table only the driver name would be matched against >>> meaning that WM8987 devices wouldn't be bound. > >> Subject line is for wrong codec but otherwise (with new subject line) > > Hrm? Subject line says WM8987... But the diff said WM8750 iirc. Liam