From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow source specification for CODEC level sysclk Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:54:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4E5E12EF.7020301@ti.com> References: <1314212978-18293-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B211038E2 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:54:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1314212978-18293-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 24/08/11 20:09, Mark Brown wrote: > Similarly to PLLs/FLLs some modern CODECs provide selectable system clock > sources. When the clock is the clock for a DAI we do not usually need to > identify which clock is being configured so can use clk_id for the source > clock but with CODEC wide system clocks we will need to specify both the > clock being configured and the source. > > Add a source argument to the CODEC driver set_sysclk() operation to > reflect this. As this operation is not as widely used as the DAI > set_sysclk() operation the change is not very invasive. We probably > ought to go and make the same alternation for DAIs at some point. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Liam Girdwood