From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [patch][saa7134] do not change mute state for capturing audio Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 07:57:28 -0300 Message-ID: <4E7DB798.4060201@infradead.org> References: <4E19D2F7.6060803@list.ru> <4E24BEB8.4060501@redhat.com> <4E257FF5.4040401@infradead.org> <4E258B60.6010007@list.ru> <4E25906D.3020200@infradead.org> <4E259B0C.90107@list.ru> <4E25A26A.2000204@infradead.org> <4E25A7C2.3050609@list.ru> <4E25C7AE.5020503@infradead.org> <4E25CF35.7000802@list.ru> <4E25DB37.8020609@infradead.org> <4E25FDE4.7040805@list.ru> <4E262772.9060509@infradead.org> <4E266799.8030706@list.ru> <4E26AEC0.5000405@infradead.org> <4E26B1E7.2080107@list.ru> <4E26B29B.4010109@infradead.org> <4E292BED.60108@list.ru> <4E296D00.9040608@infradead.org> <4E296F6C.9080107@list.ru> <4E2971D4.1060109@infradead.org> <4E29738F.7040605@list.ru> <4E297505.7090307@infradead.org> <4E29E02A.1020402@list.ru> <4E2A23C7.3040209@infradead.org> <4E2A7BF0.8080606@list.ru> <4E2AC742.8020407@infradead.org> <4E2ACAAD.4050602@list.ru> <4E2AE40F.7030108@infradead.org> <4E2C5A35.9030404@list.ru> <4E2C6638.2040707@infrade ad.org> <4E760BCA.6080900@list.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6C02446E for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:57:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4E760BCA.6080900@list.ru> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Stas Sergeev Cc: "Nickolay V. Shmyrev" , Lennart Poettering , ALSA devel , linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Em 18-09-2011 12:18, Stas Sergeev escreveu: > Hi Mauro, I've finally found the time (and an energy) > to go look into the automute breakage. > With the attached automute fix I no longer have > any problems with pulseaudio. > I also attached the patch that introduces an "std" > option to limit the scan list, resulting in a faster scan. > It is completely unrelated to the automute one, it is > here just in case. > What do you think? Please, one patch per email. Patchwork (or any kernel maintainer script) won't catch more than one patch per email. See: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7862/ As those are the two last patches marked as new at patchwork, I've manually uploaded it as two separate emails, in order to allow me to queue them: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7940/ http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7941/ With respect to this patch: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7941/ I don't see any sense on it. Video standard selection is done by software, when a standards mask is passed via VIDIOC_S_STD ioctl. Drivers should not mess it with modprobe hacks. I'll comment later http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7940/. It seems to be going into the right direction, but I need to take a deeper code inspection and maybe do some tests here. Regards, Mauro