From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 9 (sound/soc vs. drivers/misc) Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:57:04 -0800 Message-ID: <4F0B54A0.20905@xenotime.net> References: <20120109170457.4465dfc66a0eace4a2230fef@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120109170457.4465dfc66a0eace4a2230fef@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Greg KH , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 01/08/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120106: > > This tree is still broken for sparc64 defconfig (at least). AFAICT, all builds (on X86_32 or X86_64) have this kconfig warning: drivers/misc/Kconfig:212:error: recursive dependency detected! drivers/misc/Kconfig:212: symbol ATMEL_SSC is selected by SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig:9: symbol SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC is selected by SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731 sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig:18: symbol SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731 depends on ATMEL_SSC -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***