From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: Add wrapper for
	device_tx_status callback
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:13:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4FE1BE79.5080903@metafoo.de>
References: <1339438302-12417-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
	<1340189662.1927.1648.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from smtp-out-150.synserver.de (smtp-out-159.synserver.de
	[212.40.185.159])
	by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EF52454C
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:10:30 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1340189662.1927.1648.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ola Lilja <ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi>, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On 06/20/2012 12:54 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 20:11 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> This patch adds a small inline wrapper for the devivce_tx_status callback of a
>> dma device. This makes the source code of users of this function a bit more
>> compact and a bit more legible.
> Applied, thanks
> 
> rest of the series should go thru ASoC tree.
> 

Thanks.

There is a compile time dependency between the patches, so this patch should
go through the ASoC tree as well, or we'll have to wait another release
before the ASoC patches can be applied.

- Lars