From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bo Shen Subject: Re: "disable" or "disabled" in DT? Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:51:11 +0800 Message-ID: <50C9348F.3000209@atmel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sjogate2.atmel.com (newsmtp5.atmel.com [204.2.163.5]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3012615CD for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:52:07 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Takashi, On 12/12/2012 22:50, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Hi, > > in the recent commit for atmel-ssc to add DT support, you added the > lines > status = "disable"; Good catch, thanks. I will send a patch to correct this. Best Regards, Bo Shen > > Now looking through all commits for merging 3.8-rc1, I noticed that > other codes have > status = "disabled"; > > I think this should be kept consistent. > > > Takashi >