From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ASoC: core: Allow DAI links to be specified by using ACPI names
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 17:22:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524D7DB5.1010608@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131003133729.GR27287@sirena.org.uk>
On 10/03/2013 04:37 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:33:56PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>
>> For instance, matchine drivers could specify codec in DAI link by using:
>> .codec_name = "INT33CA:00",
>> instead of
>> .codec_name = "rt5640.0-001c",
>> Note that ACPI name is used just an alias during bind time and core
>> continues to use device name. In fact, machine drivers could use either
>> names.
> This is making me wonder if we shouldn't be taking the stable names we
> get from ACPI as the dev_name() instead of our internal ones on ACPI
> systems (and possibly something similar on DT) rather than adding custom
> code like this.
This is actually somewhat confusing issue. I think it's relatively easy
to switch using ACPI names within ASoC core (by modifying
fmt_single_name or something like that).
Problem is that for ACPI enumerated client devices the dev_name(dev)
still comes from those subsystems as before. So for instance dev_ prints
in codec driver or ASoC core keeps printing "rt5640 0-001c:" as before
and I personally find it a bit more confusing if internal ASoC names
don't match as easily with dev_ prints.
But yes, I agree. This alias name in DAI link is not that clear either
as it exists only during bind time.
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-03 12:33 [RFC] ASoC: core: Allow DAI links to be specified by using ACPI names Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-03 13:37 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-03 14:22 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2013-10-03 15:29 ` [alsa-devel] " Vinod Koul
2013-10-03 16:56 ` Liam Girdwood
2013-10-03 16:19 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-04 6:28 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-04 6:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-04 7:38 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-04 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-04 6:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-04 7:22 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-04 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-24 9:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-25 6:53 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-25 10:06 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-25 10:42 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-28 11:53 ` [alsa-devel] " Liam Girdwood
2013-10-28 15:06 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-28 15:23 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-28 16:46 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524D7DB5.1010608@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).