From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: separately enable and disable TIE/RIE in trigger() Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:40:33 -0500 Message-ID: <526FACC1.7010909@tabi.org> References: <1383044688-28596-1-git-send-email-b42378@freescale.com> <526FA330.3080209@tabi.org> <20131029115711.GA9605@MrMyself> <526FA78D.2090601@tabi.org> <20131029121330.GB9605@MrMyself> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from muin.pair.com (muin.pair.com [209.68.1.55]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8130261ACB for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:40:35 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20131029121330.GB9605@MrMyself> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Nicolin Chen Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Nicolin Chen wrote: > The DMA request might be remaining high if not disabling it. Might? Are you just guessing? > This would > cause SDMA re-check this request, while it has no BD existing. For the > other interrupts, if you don't like it, I can drop it. Just modification > to the driver might not be less complicated. I'm only talking about this particular patch.