* [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes @ 2013-12-13 12:13 Nenghua Cao 2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao 2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Yacine Belkadi, alsa-devel Cc: Henry zhao, Nenghua Cao, cxie4 From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> V2 -> V1: Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion. >> Usually backward compatibility is concerned when something new breaks >> the existing ones. In your case, always updating DPCM would work, >> too, even without an extra flag; it's just suboptimal. >Right, and if we have separate versions then at some point we'll end up >having to define DPCM versions of everything which is going to get >tedious and error prone. V1 -> V0: refined patch, and add flag into soc_mixer_control and soc_enum instead of the alsa core, according to Takashi's suggestion. > You don't need to extend the ALSA core API for such a purpose. It's > ASoC-specific, so rather extend struct soc_mixer_control instead, if > such a new flag is really needed. Nenghua Cao (1): ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-13 12:13 [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-13 12:13 ` Nenghua Cao 2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul 2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown 2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Yacine Belkadi, alsa-devel Cc: Henry zhao, Nenghua Cao, cxie4 From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature. Signed-off-by: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> --- sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index dcade13..67e63ab 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -2868,6 +2868,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, unsigned int val; int connect, change; struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; + int ret = 0; if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc)) dev_warn(codec->dapm.dev, @@ -2901,12 +2902,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, card->update = &update; } - soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect); + ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect); card->update = NULL; } mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); + + if (ret > 0) + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); + return change; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw); @@ -2955,6 +2960,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, unsigned int val, mux, change; unsigned int mask; struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; + int ret = 0; if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1) return -EINVAL; @@ -2978,12 +2984,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, update.val = val; card->update = &update; - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); card->update = NULL; } mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); + + if (ret > 0) + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); + return change; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double); @@ -3019,6 +3029,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value; int change; + int ret = 0; if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max) return -EINVAL; @@ -3028,9 +3039,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, value = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; change = dapm_kcontrol_set_value(kcontrol, value); if (change) - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e); + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e); mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); + + if (ret > 0) + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); + return change; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt); @@ -3097,6 +3112,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, unsigned int val, mux, change; unsigned int mask; struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; + int ret = 0; if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1) return -EINVAL; @@ -3120,12 +3136,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, update.val = val; card->update = &update; - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); card->update = NULL; } mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); + + if (ret > 0) + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); + return change; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double); -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul 2013-12-16 2:43 ` Nenghua Cao 2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2013-12-15 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nenghua Cao Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry zhao, Mark Brown, Yacine Belkadi, cxie4 On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:49PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: > From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> > > DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based > on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in > get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature. > > Signed-off-by: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> > --- > sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c > index dcade13..67e63ab 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c > @@ -2868,6 +2868,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > unsigned int val; > int connect, change; > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; > + int ret = 0; > > if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc)) > dev_warn(codec->dapm.dev, > @@ -2901,12 +2902,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > card->update = &update; > } > > - soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect); > + ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect); > > card->update = NULL; > } > > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); > + > + if (ret > 0) > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); This version looks much better! Btw would it make sense to have flag in card for dynmaic support and call soc_dpcm_runtime_update() for only these cards? -- ~Vinod > + > return change; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw); > @@ -2955,6 +2960,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > unsigned int val, mux, change; > unsigned int mask; > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; > + int ret = 0; > > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -2978,12 +2984,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > update.val = val; > card->update = &update; > > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); > > card->update = NULL; > } > > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); > + > + if (ret > 0) > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); > + > return change; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double); > @@ -3019,6 +3029,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > struct soc_enum *e = > (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value; > int change; > + int ret = 0; > > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -3028,9 +3039,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > value = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; > change = dapm_kcontrol_set_value(kcontrol, value); > if (change) > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e); > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e); > > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); > + > + if (ret > 0) > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); > + > return change; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt); > @@ -3097,6 +3112,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > unsigned int val, mux, change; > unsigned int mask; > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; > + int ret = 0; > > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -3120,12 +3136,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > update.val = val; > card->update = &update; > > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); > > card->update = NULL; > } > > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); > + > + if (ret > 0) > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); > + > return change; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double); > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Alsa-devel mailing list > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul @ 2013-12-16 2:43 ` Nenghua Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-16 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vinod Koul Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry Zhao, Mark Brown, Yacine Belkadi, Chao Xie On 12/15/2013 09:56 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:49PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: >> > From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> >> > >> > DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based >> > on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in >> > get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> >> > --- >> > sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c >> > index dcade13..67e63ab 100644 >> > --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c >> > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c >> > @@ -2868,6 +2868,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > unsigned int val; >> > int connect, change; >> > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; >> > + int ret = 0; >> > >> > if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc)) >> > dev_warn(codec->dapm.dev, >> > @@ -2901,12 +2902,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > card->update = &update; >> > } >> > >> > - soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect); >> > + ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect); >> > >> > card->update = NULL; >> > } >> > >> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); >> > + >> > + if (ret > 0) >> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); > This version looks much better! Btw would it make sense to have flag in card > for dynmaic support and call soc_dpcm_runtime_update() for only these cards? > Hi, Vinod In soc_dpcm_runtime_update(), it traverses the FE dai_link's "dynamic" flag. If the asoc driver supports DPCM, it will do update work. Or it will do nothing. After discussing with Mark and Takashi, it seems no more meaning to add this flag. > -- > ~Vinod >> > + >> > return change; >> > } >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw); >> > @@ -2955,6 +2960,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > unsigned int val, mux, change; >> > unsigned int mask; >> > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; >> > + int ret = 0; >> > >> > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1) >> > return -EINVAL; >> > @@ -2978,12 +2984,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > update.val = val; >> > card->update = &update; >> > >> > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); >> > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); >> > >> > card->update = NULL; >> > } >> > >> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); >> > + >> > + if (ret > 0) >> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); >> > + >> > return change; >> > } >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double); >> > @@ -3019,6 +3029,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > struct soc_enum *e = >> > (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value; >> > int change; >> > + int ret = 0; >> > >> > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max) >> > return -EINVAL; >> > @@ -3028,9 +3039,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > value = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; >> > change = dapm_kcontrol_set_value(kcontrol, value); >> > if (change) >> > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e); >> > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e); >> > >> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); >> > + >> > + if (ret > 0) >> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); >> > + >> > return change; >> > } >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt); >> > @@ -3097,6 +3112,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > unsigned int val, mux, change; >> > unsigned int mask; >> > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update; >> > + int ret = 0; >> > >> > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1) >> > return -EINVAL; >> > @@ -3120,12 +3136,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, >> > update.val = val; >> > card->update = &update; >> > >> > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); >> > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e); >> > >> > card->update = NULL; >> > } >> > >> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex); >> > + >> > + if (ret > 0) >> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card); >> > + >> > return change; >> > } >> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double); >> > -- >> > 1.7.0.4 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Alsa-devel mailing list >> > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org >> > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao 2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul @ 2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2013-12-16 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nenghua Cao Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry zhao, Yacine Belkadi, cxie4 [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 334 bytes --] On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:49PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: > From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> > > DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based > on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in > get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature. Applied, thanks. [-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-13 12:13 [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes Nenghua Cao 2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-16 20:13 ` Mark Brown 2013-12-17 2:59 ` Nenghua Cao 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2013-12-16 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nenghua Cao Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry zhao, Yacine Belkadi, cxie4 [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 374 bytes --] On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:48PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: > From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> > > V2 -> V1: > > Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according > to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion. Don't send cover letters for single patches, if there's anything that needs to be said put it after the --- in the patch mail. [-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown @ 2013-12-17 2:59 ` Nenghua Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-17 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry Zhao, Yacine Belkadi, Chao Xie On 12/17/2013 04:13 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:48PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote: >> From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com> >> >> V2 -> V1: >> >> Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according >> to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion. > > Don't send cover letters for single patches, if there's anything that > needs to be said put it after the --- in the patch mail. > Got it. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes @ 2013-12-16 8:03 anish singh 2013-12-16 9:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: anish singh @ 2013-12-16 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: alsa-devel, broonie, nhcao, lgirdwood, gabrbedd, Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela, Lars-Peter Clausen <This patch is dependent on the $subject so i have used $subject instead of different one> I can see only one usage of: snd_soc_dapm_mixer_update_power and zero user of: snd_soc_dapm_mux_update_power() And after this $subject patch I think both of these functions becomes redundant. It will help in reducing the code size if we can get rid of this dead code.We can also remove code from tlv320aic3x.c and just let it use the core implementation. grep -rniI "snd_soc_dapm_mixer_update_power" sound/ sound/soc/soc-dapm.c:2149: int snd_soc_dapm_mixer_update_power sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c:174: snd_soc_dapm_mixer_update_power grep -rniI "snd_soc_dapm_mux_update_power" sound/ no users. I would send a patch if experts agree. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes 2013-12-16 8:03 [PATCH]ASOC:DAPM: " anish singh @ 2013-12-16 9:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Lars-Peter Clausen @ 2013-12-16 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: anish singh; +Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, lgirdwood, nhcao, broonie, gabrbedd On 12/16/2013 09:03 AM, anish singh wrote: > <This patch is dependent on the $subject > so i have used $subject instead of different > one> > I can see only one usage of: > snd_soc_dapm_mixer_update_power > and zero user of: > snd_soc_dapm_mux_update_power() > > And after this $subject patch I think > both of these functions becomes redundant. No, the patch doesn't change anything in regard to those two functions. Those two functions are used by drivers where the mixer or mux has a special register layout that is not covered by the core mixer and mux update functions and where does not make sense to add support for this to the core functions since the layout is special. > > It will help in reducing the code size if we > can get rid of this dead code.We can > also remove code from tlv320aic3x.c and > just let it use the core implementation. The tlv320aic3x driver has special requirements, hence it has its own function for updating the mux settings. - Lars ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-17 2:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-12-13 12:13 [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes Nenghua Cao 2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao 2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul 2013-12-16 2:43 ` Nenghua Cao 2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown 2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown 2013-12-17 2:59 ` Nenghua Cao -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2013-12-16 8:03 [PATCH]ASOC:DAPM: " anish singh 2013-12-16 9:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).