* [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
@ 2013-12-13 12:10 Nenghua Cao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-13 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown,
Yacine Belkadi, alsa-devel
Cc: Henry zhao, Nenghua Cao, cxie4
From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
V2 -> V1:
Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according
to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion.
>> Usually backward compatibility is concerned when something new breaks
>> the existing ones. In your case, always updating DPCM would work,
>> too, even without an extra flag; it's just suboptimal.
>Right, and if we have separate versions then at some point we'll end up
>having to define DPCM versions of everything which is going to get
>tedious and error prone.
V1 -> V0:
refined patch, and add flag into soc_mixer_control and soc_enum
instead of the alsa core, according to Takashi's suggestion.
> You don't need to extend the ALSA core API for such a purpose. It's
> ASoC-specific, so rather extend struct soc_mixer_control instead, if
> such a new flag is really needed.
Nenghua Cao (1):
ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
@ 2013-12-13 12:13 Nenghua Cao
2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao
2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown,
Yacine Belkadi, alsa-devel
Cc: Henry zhao, Nenghua Cao, cxie4
From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
V2 -> V1:
Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according
to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion.
>> Usually backward compatibility is concerned when something new breaks
>> the existing ones. In your case, always updating DPCM would work,
>> too, even without an extra flag; it's just suboptimal.
>Right, and if we have separate versions then at some point we'll end up
>having to define DPCM versions of everything which is going to get
>tedious and error prone.
V1 -> V0:
refined patch, and add flag into soc_mixer_control and soc_enum
instead of the alsa core, according to Takashi's suggestion.
> You don't need to extend the ALSA core API for such a purpose. It's
> ASoC-specific, so rather extend struct soc_mixer_control instead, if
> such a new flag is really needed.
Nenghua Cao (1):
ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
2013-12-13 12:13 [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes Nenghua Cao
@ 2013-12-13 12:13 ` Nenghua Cao
2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul
2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-13 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown,
Yacine Belkadi, alsa-devel
Cc: Henry zhao, Nenghua Cao, cxie4
From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based
on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in
get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature.
Signed-off-by: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index dcade13..67e63ab 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -2868,6 +2868,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
unsigned int val;
int connect, change;
struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
+ int ret = 0;
if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc))
dev_warn(codec->dapm.dev,
@@ -2901,12 +2902,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
card->update = &update;
}
- soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect);
+ ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect);
card->update = NULL;
}
mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
+
+ if (ret > 0)
+ soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
+
return change;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw);
@@ -2955,6 +2960,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
unsigned int val, mux, change;
unsigned int mask;
struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
+ int ret = 0;
if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2978,12 +2984,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
update.val = val;
card->update = &update;
- soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
+ ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
card->update = NULL;
}
mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
+
+ if (ret > 0)
+ soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
+
return change;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double);
@@ -3019,6 +3029,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e =
(struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
int change;
+ int ret = 0;
if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -3028,9 +3039,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
value = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
change = dapm_kcontrol_set_value(kcontrol, value);
if (change)
- soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e);
+ ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e);
mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
+
+ if (ret > 0)
+ soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
+
return change;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt);
@@ -3097,6 +3112,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
unsigned int val, mux, change;
unsigned int mask;
struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
+ int ret = 0;
if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -3120,12 +3136,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
update.val = val;
card->update = &update;
- soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
+ ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
card->update = NULL;
}
mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
+
+ if (ret > 0)
+ soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
+
return change;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao
@ 2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul
2013-12-16 2:43 ` Nenghua Cao
2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2013-12-15 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nenghua Cao
Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry zhao, Mark Brown,
Yacine Belkadi, cxie4
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:49PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote:
> From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
>
> DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based
> on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in
> get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> index dcade13..67e63ab 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> @@ -2868,6 +2868,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> unsigned int val;
> int connect, change;
> struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc))
> dev_warn(codec->dapm.dev,
> @@ -2901,12 +2902,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> card->update = &update;
> }
>
> - soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect);
> + ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect);
>
> card->update = NULL;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
> +
> + if (ret > 0)
> + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
This version looks much better! Btw would it make sense to have flag in card
for dynmaic support and call soc_dpcm_runtime_update() for only these cards?
--
~Vinod
> +
> return change;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw);
> @@ -2955,6 +2960,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> unsigned int val, mux, change;
> unsigned int mask;
> struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2978,12 +2984,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> update.val = val;
> card->update = &update;
>
> - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
> + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
>
> card->update = NULL;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
> +
> + if (ret > 0)
> + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
> +
> return change;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double);
> @@ -3019,6 +3029,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> struct soc_enum *e =
> (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
> int change;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3028,9 +3039,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> value = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
> change = dapm_kcontrol_set_value(kcontrol, value);
> if (change)
> - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e);
> + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e);
>
> mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
> +
> + if (ret > 0)
> + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
> +
> return change;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt);
> @@ -3097,6 +3112,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> unsigned int val, mux, change;
> unsigned int mask;
> struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3120,12 +3136,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> update.val = val;
> card->update = &update;
>
> - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
> + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
>
> card->update = NULL;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
> +
> + if (ret > 0)
> + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
> +
> return change;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double);
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul
@ 2013-12-16 2:43 ` Nenghua Cao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-16 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vinod Koul
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood,
Henry Zhao, Mark Brown, Yacine Belkadi, Chao Xie
On 12/15/2013 09:56 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:49PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote:
>> > From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
>> >
>> > DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based
>> > on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in
>> > get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
>> > ---
>> > sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
>> > index dcade13..67e63ab 100644
>> > --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
>> > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
>> > @@ -2868,6 +2868,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > unsigned int val;
>> > int connect, change;
>> > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
>> > + int ret = 0;
>> >
>> > if (snd_soc_volsw_is_stereo(mc))
>> > dev_warn(codec->dapm.dev,
>> > @@ -2901,12 +2902,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > card->update = &update;
>> > }
>> >
>> > - soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect);
>> > + ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect);
>> >
>> > card->update = NULL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
>> > +
>> > + if (ret > 0)
>> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
> This version looks much better! Btw would it make sense to have flag in card
> for dynmaic support and call soc_dpcm_runtime_update() for only these cards?
>
Hi, Vinod
In soc_dpcm_runtime_update(), it traverses the FE dai_link's
"dynamic" flag. If the asoc driver supports DPCM, it will do update
work. Or it will do nothing. After discussing with Mark and Takashi, it
seems no more meaning to add this flag.
> --
> ~Vinod
>> > +
>> > return change;
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw);
>> > @@ -2955,6 +2960,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > unsigned int val, mux, change;
>> > unsigned int mask;
>> > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
>> > + int ret = 0;
>> >
>> > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> > @@ -2978,12 +2984,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > update.val = val;
>> > card->update = &update;
>> >
>> > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
>> > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
>> >
>> > card->update = NULL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
>> > +
>> > + if (ret > 0)
>> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
>> > +
>> > return change;
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double);
>> > @@ -3019,6 +3029,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > struct soc_enum *e =
>> > (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
>> > int change;
>> > + int ret = 0;
>> >
>> > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->max)
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> > @@ -3028,9 +3039,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > value = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
>> > change = dapm_kcontrol_set_value(kcontrol, value);
>> > if (change)
>> > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e);
>> > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, value, e);
>> >
>> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
>> > +
>> > + if (ret > 0)
>> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
>> > +
>> > return change;
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_virt);
>> > @@ -3097,6 +3112,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > unsigned int val, mux, change;
>> > unsigned int mask;
>> > struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
>> > + int ret = 0;
>> >
>> > if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > e->max - 1)
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> > @@ -3120,12 +3136,16 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> > update.val = val;
>> > card->update = &update;
>> >
>> > - soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
>> > + ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, mux, e);
>> >
>> > card->update = NULL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > mutex_unlock(&card->dapm_mutex);
>> > +
>> > + if (ret > 0)
>> > + soc_dpcm_runtime_update(card);
>> > +
>> > return change;
>> > }
>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_dapm_put_value_enum_double);
>> > --
>> > 1.7.0.4
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Alsa-devel mailing list
>> > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
>> > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
2013-12-13 12:13 [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes Nenghua Cao
2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao
@ 2013-12-16 20:13 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-17 2:59 ` Nenghua Cao
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-12-16 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nenghua Cao
Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry zhao,
Yacine Belkadi, cxie4
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 374 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:48PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote:
> From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
>
> V2 -> V1:
>
> Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according
> to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion.
Don't send cover letters for single patches, if there's anything that
needs to be said put it after the --- in the patch mail.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao
2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul
@ 2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-12-16 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nenghua Cao
Cc: alsa-devel, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood, Henry zhao,
Yacine Belkadi, cxie4
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 334 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:49PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote:
> From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
>
> DPCM can dynamically alter the FE to BE PCM links at runtime based
> on mixer/mux setting updates. Add soc_dpcm_runtime_update() calling in
> get/put function for mixer/mux to support this feature.
Applied, thanks.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes
2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown
@ 2013-12-17 2:59 ` Nenghua Cao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nenghua Cao @ 2013-12-17 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai, Liam Girdwood,
Henry Zhao, Yacine Belkadi, Chao Xie
On 12/17/2013 04:13 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:13:48PM +0800, Nenghua Cao wrote:
>> From: Nenghua Cao <nhcao@marvell.com>
>>
>> V2 -> V1:
>>
>> Removes the flag and update DPCM always when mixer/mux changes, according
>> to Takashi's and Mark's suggestion.
>
> Don't send cover letters for single patches, if there's anything that
> needs to be said put it after the --- in the patch mail.
>
Got it. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-17 2:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-13 12:13 [PATCH V2] ASOC:DAPM: update DPCM runtime when mixer/mux changes Nenghua Cao
2013-12-13 12:13 ` [PATCH] " Nenghua Cao
2013-12-15 13:56 ` Vinod Koul
2013-12-16 2:43 ` Nenghua Cao
2013-12-16 20:14 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-16 20:13 ` [PATCH V2] " Mark Brown
2013-12-17 2:59 ` Nenghua Cao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-13 12:10 Nenghua Cao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).