From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:50:04 +0100 Message-ID: <5315E81C.2010704@ladisch.de> References: <5315E118.7060809@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de (dehamd003.servertools24.de [31.47.254.18]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B54B265774 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 15:50:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <5315E118.7060809@canonical.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: David Henningsson , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" Cc: Takashi Iwai , Lars-Peter Clausen , General PulseAudio Discussion List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org David Henningsson wrote: > So, PulseAudio removed timer scheduling for drivers with > SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH, and released 5.0. Meanwhile, USB drivers still > have SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH, so this leads to performance regressions for > USB sound cards. > > The question remains - what does SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH really mean? For your purposes, it means that the pointer accuracy is likely to be worse than that of other sound cards. There should be a mechanism to report the actual granularity. Regards, Clemens