From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Make ADSP memory block allocation more generic
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:26:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5449FF2A.9070200@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5449FE1B.9000201@linux.intel.com>
On 10/24/2014 10:22 AM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Hi Liam
>
> On 10/22/2014 02:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:06:46PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
>>> Current block allocation is tied to block type and requestor type.
>>> Make the
>>> allocation more generic by removing the struct module parameter and
>>> adding
>>> a generic block allocator structure. Also pass in the list that the
>>> blocks
>>> have to be added too in order to remove dependence on block
>>> requestor type.
>> I'm having trouble apply this - patch 1 manages to apply with some fuzz
>> but patch 5 is failing. Probably needs refreshing against Vinod's
>> recent changes? I applied everything up to patch 4 (ASoC: Intel: Add
>> runtime module support).
>
> For me sound.git for-next head a929d726a507 don't build anymore. I
> have to revert all your four recent patches cd51c82524ff -4. I guess
> some patch order or dependency issue since the first patch doesn't
> build when applied to topic/intel?
>
Ah, nevermind. Mark was dropped these already. I was building at my
local copy of for-next branch before patches were dropped.
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-24 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-20 14:06 [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Make ADSP memory block allocation more generic Liam Girdwood
2014-10-20 14:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] ASoC: Intel: update scratch allocator to use generic block allocator Liam Girdwood
2014-10-20 14:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] ASoC: Intel: Add call to calculate offsets internally within the DSP Liam Girdwood
2014-10-20 14:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: Intel: Add runtime module support Liam Girdwood
2014-10-20 14:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] ASoC: Intel: Add DMA firmware loading support Liam Girdwood
2014-10-20 14:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] ASoC: Intel: Add runtime module lookup API call Liam Girdwood
2014-10-20 14:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] ASoC: Intel: Provide streams with dynamic module information Liam Girdwood
2014-10-21 23:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Make ADSP memory block allocation more generic Mark Brown
2014-10-22 9:07 ` Mark Brown
2014-10-24 7:22 ` Jarkko Nikula
2014-10-24 7:26 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2014-10-27 10:09 ` Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5449FF2A.9070200@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox