Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
	"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: Some questions about userspace control elements
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 18:50:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CE675A.80004@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CE10D2.7090903@sakamocchi.jp>

Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> 1.The 'numid' is unique number for each element or not?
> I want to use it to indicate each element, if possible. But there're
> more members in snd_ctl_elem_id structure.

The other members help with searching elements.  But numid itself must
be unique.

> 2.The 'numid' can be notified in SND_CTL_EVENT_MASK_ADD event?
> As long as I test, it's always zero when userspace applications add any
> elements. Is it an expected behaviour? Or a bug?

This looks like a bug in the kernel code.

All the other members of the id structure should be correct; as
a workaround, try calling snd_ctl_elem_info().

> 3.The way to change permissions of each control element.
> Is it possible after adding the elements? If possible, how to notify it
> in the other processes?

At the moment, this is not possible for userspace controls.

What bit(s) do you want to change?

> 4.Any elements added by a process are not removed at closing snd_ctl_t.
> They're remained after closing the process' snd_ctl_t. Is it an expected
> behaviour? Or a bug?

This is by design.  These controls are intended to be a property of the
device itself, and to be somewhat permanent.

> 5.Processes can delete elements which the other processes added.
> Is it an expected behaviour? Or a bug?

For permanent controls, it would not be possible to remember which
process created them originally.

> 6.The operation to replace elements generates separate events.
> ADD/REMOVE events occurs sequencially. Userspace application cannot
> distinguish replacement from adding/removing, therefore cannot process
> appropriate action. Is it an expected behaviour? Or a bug?

Replacement is just a shortcut for removing/adding.  So far, changing
the properties of userspace controls has not been necessary.


Regards,
Clemens

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-01 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-01 11:41 Some questions about userspace control elements Takashi Sakamoto
2015-02-01 17:50 ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2015-02-02 14:14   ` Takashi Sakamoto
2015-02-04 23:51   ` Takashi Sakamoto
2015-02-05  0:44     ` Takashi Sakamoto
2015-02-06  9:38       ` Clemens Ladisch
2015-02-07  1:58         ` Takashi Sakamoto
2015-02-07 15:45           ` Clemens Ladisch
2015-02-08 10:57             ` Takashi Sakamoto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54CE675A.80004@ladisch.de \
    --to=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox