From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ALSA: control: fix over 80 characters
	lines
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:47:40 +0900
Message-ID: <54DCA0EC.1010107@sakamocchi.jp>
References: <1423651052-19593-1-git-send-email-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>	<1423651052-19593-7-git-send-email-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
 <s5h4mqspshi.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from smtp311.phy.lolipop.jp (smtp311.phy.lolipop.jp [210.157.22.79])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D517F2604E5
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:47:43 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <s5h4mqspshi.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, clemens@ladisch.de
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Feb 11 2015 21:01, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:37:30 +0900,
> Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>> @@ -1010,7 +1013,8 @@ struct user_element {
>>  	unsigned int elem_data_size;	/* size of element data in bytes */
>>  	void *tlv_data;			/* TLV data */
>>  	unsigned long tlv_data_size;	/* TLV data size */
>> -	void *priv_data;		/* private data (like strings for enumerated type) */
>> +	/* private data (like strings for enumerated type) */
>> +	void *priv_data;
> 
> Better to put the comment in the same line like other fields.

Which do you mean, we allow this line over 80 characters (keep what it
was), or I should revise this comment within 80 characters considering
the authours idea?


Regards

Takashi Sakamoto