From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org, timur@tabi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Do not create debugfs directory
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:56:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552630A2.3060400@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409074953.GA62585@Asurada-CZ80>
On 04/09/2015 09:49 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:21:24PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
>>
>> Since commit 81c7cfd1b22a0 ("ASoC: Move debugfs registration to the
>> component level") ASoC core code deals with registering debugfs, so we
>> should not be creating the debugfs directory locally in order to avoid
>> the following warning:
>>
>> fsl-ssi-dai 2028000.ssi: ASoC: Failed to create component debugfs directory
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Only remove dir creation/remove as suggested by Mark Brown
>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi_dbg.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi_dbg.c
>> index 5469ffb..46cea84 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi_dbg.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi_dbg.c
>> @@ -142,22 +142,15 @@ static const struct file_operations fsl_ssi_stats_ops = {
>>
>> int fsl_ssi_debugfs_create(struct fsl_ssi_dbg *ssi_dbg, struct device *dev)
>> {
>> - ssi_dbg->dbg_dir = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(dev), NULL);
>> - if (!ssi_dbg->dbg_dir)
>> + ssi_dbg->dbg_stats = debugfs_create_file("stats", S_IRUGO, NULL,
>> + ssi_dbg, &fsl_ssi_stats_ops);
>> + if (!ssi_dbg->dbg_stats)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - ssi_dbg->dbg_stats = debugfs_create_file("stats", S_IRUGO,
>> - ssi_dbg->dbg_dir, ssi_dbg, &fsl_ssi_stats_ops);
>
> It seems that dropping the dbg_dir and using NULL will make the stats
> become an orphan inside the debugfs. I am wondering if we can get the
> dbg_dir from the component so as to put this stats under the directory
> of SSIn as before.
That would be the right thing I guess. But the original code registers a
top-level debugfs directory with the name of the device. Whereas the debugfs
directory for the component is created in asoc/CARD_NAME/. I don't see how
these two could collide? I think the patch is trying to fix the wrong thing,
the issue for the collision is something else.
- Lars
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 17:21 [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Do not create debugfs directory Fabio Estevam
2015-04-09 7:49 ` Nicolin Chen
2015-04-09 7:56 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552630A2.3060400@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=timur@tabi.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox