From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: No need call of_device_is_available() Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 22:16:20 -0500 Message-ID: <554C2A84.3010508@tabi.org> References: <1431051856-22476-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from muin.pair.com (muin.pair.com [209.68.1.55]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D572612D2 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 05:16:23 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1431051856-22476-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Fabio Estevam , broonie@kernel.org Cc: nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Fabio Estevam , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Fabio Estevam wrote: > The comment and the call to of_device_is_available() are not really > needed. > > It is the expected behaviour to probe only the ssi nodes that are > enabled in the device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam Acked-by: Timur Tabi