From: Nikesh <noswal@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Nikesh Oswal <nikesh@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nikesh.Oswal@cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: add kcontrol to switch regulator to regulated/bypass state
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:13:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F157D6.5000307@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150908132247.GD9751@sirena.org.uk>
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response. The problem we had is the dapm is holding an
instance of the regulator and we wanted to control that instance based
on use-case. But I understand your point that we should not be exposing
regulators to userspace but manage it in the driver itself..will have a
re-think
Thanks,
Nikesh
On 08/09/15 14:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:14:09AM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote:
>> When regulator is defined with SND_SOC_DAPM_REGULATOR_CONTROL_BYPASS
>> flag, then a kcontrol will be created which can be used to switch
>> regulator to regulated/bypass state. This will help to control the
>> behaviour of the regulator based on a usecase. For example voice call
>> may need a regulated voltage to acheive higher quality whereas voice
>> trigger may need bypass voltage so as to save on power.
> This is really not a good idea, moving a regulator from regulated to
> bypass without coordination with the driver is a recipie for bugs at
> best and physical damage at worst. It's something that should be being
> done by the device driver based on the current state of the device, the
> general model is that we always drive to the lowest power state possible
> based on what the device is currently doing. If the device is set up to
> do something that can use an unregulated supply then it should put the
> supply into bypass mode without any help from userspace.
>
> As I think we went through the last time you submitted code to the core
> it is very important that we have coherent and safe abstractions that
> result in code which does what it says. The code in the core has to
> work coherently for everyone, just randomly punching holes through
> abstractions for system specific hacks from userspace is not going to do
> that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 10:14 [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: add kcontrol to switch regulator to regulated/bypass state Nikesh Oswal
2015-09-08 13:22 ` Mark Brown
2015-09-10 10:13 ` Nikesh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F157D6.5000307@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=noswal@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=Nikesh.Oswal@cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikesh@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).