From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mengdong Lin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ASoC: Change the PCM runtime array to a list Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 04:30:56 -0500 Message-ID: <564D96D0.3030305@linux.intel.com> References: <20151118183021.GK31303@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A9A2614E2 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:15:07 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20151118183021.GK31303@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, mengdong.lin@intel.com, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, jeeja.kp@intel.com, subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:31:26AM -0500, mengdong.lin@linux.intel.com wrote: >> From: Mengdong Lin >> >> The 2 patches are a preparation to allow the topology core to create >> PCM devices dynamically. Probing a component may load its topology and >> come up with new DAI links and thus new runtimes. So implementing the >> PCM runtimes in a list makes it easier to add new runtimes. > > I've got two apparently identical copies of this series that have > threaded together into one thread. I'm going to look at what looks like > the newer copy but I might get it wrong, please check. > Hi Mark, Thanks for your review! These two series are exactly same. Since the 1st one has no feedback for ~2 weeks, I thought it may be buried by the mail flood and so sent again yesterday. I'll send the following patches. Regards Mengdong