From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Baytrail followup Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:41:48 -0600 Message-ID: <568BD62C.6050405@linux.intel.com> References: <1451949630-3475-1-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20160105124340.GA16023@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81B52610C5 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:41:47 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20160105124340.GA16023@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 1/5/16 6:43 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:20:22PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> Thanks to Mark for merging most of the patches in the first batch. >> Resending update for patches that where not merged. >> No additional functionalitity, only correction in first patch to refer to >> correct SHA1 and copy/paste fixes in bytcr_rt5651 machine driver > > For future reference if you're sending a bunch of unrelated patches it's > easier to send them separately to make it clear that there are no > dependencies. Will do. It was convenient for me since I could keep track of a single patch list and test the same kernel on multiple Baytrail platforms but yes they are not related.