From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: fsl: select SND_SOC_FSL_SAI or SND_SOC_FSL_SSI depending on SoC type Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:10:40 -0600 Message-ID: <56965AE0.40706@tabi.org> References: <1452622411-16674-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1452622411-16674-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1452622411-16674-3-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <569545EB.4080307@tabi.org> <20160113133810.167d2dbb@ipc1.ka-ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160113133810.167d2dbb@ipc1.ka-ro> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=c3=9fmann?= Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Fabio Estevam , Jaroslav Kysela , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Nicolin Chen , Takashi Iwai , Xiubo Li , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann wrote: > Why? If more than one of the IMX6 SoCs are selected, both interfaces > may be selected at the same time without any harm. Oh, ok. I thought the point behind the patch was that you *souldn't*=20 enable the the SSI driver on an i.MX6UL.