From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: fsl_ssi: remove register defaults
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:16:24 -0600
Message-ID: <569B23A8.3010006@tabi.org>
References: <5677107C.60904@maciej.szmigiero.name>
 <CAOMZO5C+32Nn6+Nv9KeVrd_Qeso-wEZZNU45G8h+e6LHdMoQYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOMZO5BE7=EdmEyMOq5WH=qv_0H3AGcyyDMJFoemLRJ=O5YLNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <5693B4C1.4060400@maciej.szmigiero.name>
 <CAOMZO5DVKrnufV_PLD_+7FgA=ePhn1DSpzYDQPy5FZvHyGOJ-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <569AD8A7.7080803@maciej.szmigiero.name> <569ADC0D.2000807@tabi.org>
 <569AE7D1.6050607@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from muin.pair.com (muin.pair.com [209.68.1.55])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939DD2604E2
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:16:07 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <569AE7D1.6050607@maciej.szmigiero.name>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>, "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> This is because (at least according to the datasheet) imx21-class SSI
> registers end at CCSR_SSI_SRMSK (no SACC{ST,EN,DIS} regs), so
> reading them for cache initialization may not be safe.
>
> Also, a "MXC 91221 only" comment before these regs in FSL tree
> (drivers/mxc/ssi/registers.h) seems to confirm that these registers
> aren't present at least on some SSI (or SoC) models.

Can't we just mark them as precious or something, so that we don't have 
to have two structures?