From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/15] ASoC: qcom: rename rdmactl_audif_start to dmactrl_audif_start Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:48:29 +0000 Message-ID: <56B1BEDD.1010000@linaro.org> References: <1454347622-9970-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <1454347708-10446-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20160203003547.GD14436@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7485C261569 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:48:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l66so59123925wml.0 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:48:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160203003547.GD14436@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Patrick Lai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Banajit Goswami , Liam Girdwood , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 03/02/16 00:35, Kenneth Westfield wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:28:28AM -0800, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> index a6dce1b..bfc9de6 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c >> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcmops_hw_params(struct >> snd_pcm_substream *substream, >> unsigned int channels = params_channels(params); >> unsigned int regval; >> int bitwidth; >> - int ret, rdma_port = pcm_data->i2s_port + v->rdmactl_audif_start; >> + int ret, rdma_port = pcm_data->i2s_port + v->dmactl_audif_start; > > I was wondering why rdma_port had not been changed as well, until I saw > that in a later patch. Would it make sense to combine all changes > related to removing read-only indications from identifiers to one patch? Yep, I will see if I can merge this and also I need to fix the ordering, I got same report from 0day testing too. >