From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ALSA: hda - Use acpi_dev_present() Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:18:15 -0600 Message-ID: <56CB18A7.3000207@linux.intel.com> References: <20160220224724.GA19638@wunner.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F74260673 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:18:49 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai , Lukas Wunner Cc: Hui Wang , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 02/21/2016 02:17 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 23:47:24 +0100, > Lukas Wunner wrote: >> >> Hi Takashi, >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:58:19AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:05:03 +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: >>>> Hi Takashi, >>>> >>>> the acpi_dev_present() API has now landed in Linus' tree. >>>> Thus, after Linus' tree gets merged back into yours, >>>> it would be possible to use the API in the Thinkpad hda drivers >>>> as per the following patch. >>>> >>>> I've also pushed it to GitHub in case anyone prefers >>>> perusing it in a browser: >>>> https://github.com/l1k/linux/commit/a1473d726b57eaf97c4de8812c5967603068e261 >>>> >>>> An ack for this patch was kindly provided by Hui Wang with: >>>> Message-ID: <5653C291.9090607@canonical.com> >>>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2015-November/100962.html >>> >>> A back merge is ugly and I'd like to avoid it. >>> This is no urgent fix but rather a cleanup, right? If so, I'd >>> postpone this to 4.6. >> >> I've noticed this patch isn't in one of your trees, so it looks >> like it's not queued for 4.6 yet. If there are objections against >> it please let me know. If there aren't, I'd like to gently remind >> of the patch's existence. > > Sorry for the delay, it's merged now. heads-up: we've identified that the ACPI subsystem reports devices as present even if they are explicitly disabled in the BIOS _STA routine. we have a couple of WIP patches to work around this issue that is blocking for some CHT-T devices, and they pretty much amount to a revert and addition of an explicit presence test -Pierre