From: Alan Young <consult.awy@gmail.com>
To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Accurate delay reporting from dshare
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:15:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5811D3DE.8030901@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
When the kernel reports current (playback) delay via a call to
snd_pcm_status() or snd_pcm_delay() for a normal hardware PCM, then the
delay value reported is the sum of space used in the ring buffer plus
any delay reported from the underlying runtime driver.
snd_pcm_dshare_status() and snd_pcm_dshare_delay() discard this
refinement and simply report the use of some ring buffer. Why does it do
this and how could the reporting be improved? In particular I am
struggling to understand the relationship between a dshare instance's
(view of a) ring buffer and the slave (hw) PCM's ring buffer.
I understand that the *slowptr* configuration item can be set to get
more accurate position updates as part of this reporting but I get the
feeling that this will not on its own solve the problem. If it did then
one could simply use the delay value reported by the slave PCM.
The context of these questions is using dshare to expose 4 logical
stereo devices on a platform using an ARM-based SoC with a single
8-channel hardware driver. I need to get the same level of delay report
accuracy as I would do without using dshare.
Alan.
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 10:15 Alan Young [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-26 14:30 Accurate delay reporting from dshare Alan Young
2016-10-27 10:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-11-02 14:17 ` Alan Young
2016-11-02 17:34 ` Alan Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5811D3DE.8030901@gmail.com \
--to=consult.awy@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).