From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mengdong Lin Subject: Re: snd_soc_set_dmi_name - Shouldn't it use SYS_VENDOR? Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 18:19:32 +0800 Message-ID: <59085D34.2070604@linux.intel.com> References: <5aa36e3b-49f9-d7f6-df58-18dcfcda08e5@linux.intel.com> <7dbec345-e058-18ca-b4b3-e071fbc08fb0@linux.intel.com> <1493375701.2540.53.camel@loki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D2A2669CC for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:13:26 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Daniel Drake , "Lin, Mengdong" Cc: Liam Girdwood , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Pierre-Louis Bossart List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 04/29/2017 11:27 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Lin, Mengdong wrote: >> I just submitted a patch to fix this http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2017-April/120271.html >> It passed building and I will test it next Tuesday. 3 Intel machines may have null DMI_SYS_VENDOR. > > Thanks! I tested the patch on my platform here, and it is working > correctly, I now get the expected vendor name appearing in the string. > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ Many thanks for testing on your platforms! It also works on my platforms today. Regards Mengdong