Alsa-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l45: Relicense to GPL only
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:19:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <734986f7-18be-7392-17ec-cf64bf0f7b34@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230524090556.GC68926@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>



On 5/24/23 04:05, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:25:34AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
>> Cirrus never intended to upstream dual licensed code, convert to
>> GPL only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Apologies for this but this was never our intention and I believe that
>> it can be a little legally involved maintaining dual licensed kernel code.
>> Fortunately not that many people outside of Cirrus have contributed to
>> the files in question. I have CCed everyone who has contributed both
>> internally and externally.
> 
> Pierre, Uwe,
> 
> Apologies for chasing but it would be really helpful to get an
> ack for this one, we need the approval of everyone who
> contributed to fix the licensing issue.

Sorry, I missed that you were asking me...

My only contribution is a two-character change in a header file to make
cppcheck happy.

-int cs35l45_apply_patch(struct cs35l45_private *cs43l45);
+int cs35l45_apply_patch(struct cs35l45_private *cs35l45);

I double-checked with Intel legal to be sure, and there's no issue with
removing the BSD3 license.


Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>




  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-10  9:25 [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l45: Relicense to GPL only Charles Keepax
2023-05-10  9:39 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2023-05-10 14:54 ` Vlad Karpovich
2023-05-24  9:05 ` Charles Keepax
2023-05-24 12:35   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-24 16:19   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-05-25 14:57 ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-15 15:34 James Schulman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=734986f7-18be-7392-17ec-cf64bf0f7b34@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox