From: "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:10:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <758af664b89545c5be83ca2bc81078fb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120164841.GF6751@sirena.org.uk>
On 2020-11-20 5:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:40:21PM +0000, Rojewski, Cezary wrote:
>> On 2020-11-18 9:25 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>>> It helps everyone to have a single build, e.g. 'make allmodconfig' or
>>> 'make allyesconfig' would select all possible drivers and bots can run
>>> wild.
>
>> Why should bots care about not recommended code?
>> I'm against adding external dependency (intel-dsp-config) for
>> catpt for reasons I'd mentioned several times already.
>
> People care about any code that's in the kernel, especially people doing
> anything treewide. The fewer configurations people need to build to get
> code coverage the better.
>
Sure, but in this particular case there really shouldn't be "another
option". If catpt is the sole option, why add intel-dsp-config
dependency? The alternative shouldn't even exist in the kernel and be
instead removed just like /haswell/ and /baytrail/ were.
Czarek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 22:38 [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 01/14] ASoC: Intel: broadwell: add missing pm_ops Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-13 11:17 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 02/14] ASoC: Intel: bdw-rt5677: " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-13 11:19 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 03/14] ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: add helper for ACPI DSP driver selection Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 04/14] ASoC: soc-acpi: add helper to identify parent driver Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 05/14] ASoC: Intel: boards: byt/cht: set card and driver name at run time Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-04-25 18:13 ` youling257
2021-04-26 15:12 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 06/14] ASoC: Intel: byt/cht: set pm ops dynamically Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-17 17:18 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-17 17:39 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-18 13:31 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 07/14] ASoC: SOF: acpi: add dynamic selection of DSP driver Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 08/14] ASoC: Intel: Atom: " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 09/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: allow for coexistence between SOF and Atom/SST drivers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 10/14] ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: add Broadwell ACPI DSP driver selection Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 11/14] ASoC: Intel: broadwell: set card and driver name dynamically Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 12/14] ASoC: Intel: catpt: add dynamic selection of DSP driver Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 13/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: allow for coexistence between SOF and catpt drivers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-19 14:06 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-19 17:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-19 18:25 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 14/14] ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: ignore dsp_driver parameter for PCI legacy devices Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 23:04 ` [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-13 13:06 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-13 14:40 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-13 16:49 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-13 17:06 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-16 15:39 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-16 17:47 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-17 14:04 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-17 17:31 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-17 17:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-17 22:13 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-17 22:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-18 20:15 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-18 20:25 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-20 15:40 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-20 16:48 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-20 17:10 ` Rojewski, Cezary [this message]
2020-11-20 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-20 21:02 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-23 17:35 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-24 11:56 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-24 14:01 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-24 14:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-24 16:07 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-24 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-24 16:14 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-24 16:12 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-18 7:49 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-18 20:59 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-20 21:29 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=758af664b89545c5be83ca2bc81078fb@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox