From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E28C433E2 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C024D2083B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="hewhDS5m" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C024D2083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1563A82E; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:25:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 1563A82E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1600349168; bh=8XznQs2AT0aGqOZ5/qvTHiZzTK46crpdDCV3nC/DmMM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=hewhDS5mjn4GsGXIcRQhPnjeGWkISSt9PW5QqH5CPiH3FBNXI3ku3tRNcPAHCUGov apFVZ18EvV3kRpCJ6rcGl+ZlXAU4XlypL9BGkMAWM6NtAd7IFmmDiAdQbNPJ6PKKJ5 rVNVlXai7eNbRkXdDofl36Pe/ZLRIID7ZEXtXiNY= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E4AF801EC; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:25:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id B2681F80212; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B29F800E8 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:25:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 42B29F800E8 IronPort-SDR: ISMU0qW2V50HjEmOMppJ+ZkRm92YeNW4zMs+boI0nt+A73rFPXv2BFGDG1f6bsRWw2f6tXBVIZ VQ2KiTA4QG1g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9746"; a="160618246" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,437,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="160618246" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2020 06:24:57 -0700 IronPort-SDR: MdEsukergzsDZVOVHiEPcRm8K4oZADB5qgMTkHG2qSf9I7fcffOkc/FUSxHvMPnyFoFd6Ei5OW oicVp3MrxI5w== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,437,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="483744487" Received: from apauly-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.96.60]) ([10.254.96.60]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2020 06:24:54 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt715: Add module parameter to fix dmic pop sound issue. To: Mark Brown References: <20200916204758.53651-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200917112547.GC4755@sirena.org.uk> <9cbc7629-f28e-461c-1787-da5280269f99@linux.intel.com> <20200917130638.GE4755@sirena.org.uk> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <7811497f-c1fd-2c09-6f42-ac70c60f531f@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:24:53 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200917130638.GE4755@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tiwai@suse.de, Jack Yu , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Bard liao , Rander Wang X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On 9/17/20 8:06 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:00:39AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> On 9/17/20 6:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Normally we would just add a delay in the driver unconditionally, why >>> make this a module paramter? If there are board variations then we >>> should be getting them from board data, not forcing individual users to >>> bodge things with a module parameter. > >> that wasn't the intent. 400ms is the recommended value, but the parameter >> provides a way to experiment without having to recompile during >> integration/debug stages. > >> It was my recommendation to add this parameter, I don't mind removing it if >> you prefer it that way. Or I can respin the commit message and comments to >> make it clearer what the intended use was. > > It'd be better to just remove it. If you want a facility to experiment > for testing debugfs is a better fit I think, unless this is a delay that > only gets done once during probe of course in which case that wouldn't > work. ok, I'll send a v2.