From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D056C10DCE for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 21:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6C3206E6 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 21:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="RJo4aWCH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C6C3206E6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDB815E5; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:08:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 9DDB815E5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1583528937; bh=SqFw3YzVxccIJuVVxevjSPD+2eEXUBzk8C6yCR7/TqM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=RJo4aWCH3u56SwEVd2GSAo4N7pkDj4bNkkoM7W8iTH9hhElZFELD00ONwZDJqSm00 jK5Kb4pGqq387XY+idgxYgOafaU4CKK3nCcaByV0NO1ujEijN99B8mL76XbDKAzIgQ BeJVykalG/+CB6G+SAdt+vktJUTevYlRSwrt2mjI= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E6F8028E; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:06:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id CAE36F801ED; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:05:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407E5F801F5 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:05:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 407E5F801F5 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2020 13:05:49 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,523,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="275688926" Received: from jrbond-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.11.58]) ([10.254.11.58]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2020 13:05:48 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Shield against no-NHLT configurations To: Cezary Rojewski , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org References: <20200305145314.32579-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> <20200305145314.32579-5-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: <7f74b049-4659-9656-4396-3c1b42d2e32c@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 15:03:24 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200305145314.32579-5-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" > - intel_nhlt_free(skl->nhlt); > + if (skl->nhlt) > + intel_nhlt_free(skl->nhlt); we could alternatively move the test in intel_nhlt_free, which seems like a more robust thing to do?