From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@amd.com>,
"Shuming [范書銘]" <shumingf@realtek.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Flove(HsinFu)" <flove@realtek.com>,
"Oder Chiou" <oder_chiou@realtek.com>,
"Jack Yu" <jack.yu@realtek.com>,
"Derek [方德義]" <derek.fang@realtek.com>,
"Bard Liao" <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: rt5682-sdw: fix for JD event handling in ClockStop Mode0
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 16:20:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80c35e78-b82b-5d8a-bce7-fa8bb61e16cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <489e8631-b773-1916-40a7-3fd73af54c19@amd.com>
On 7/3/23 15:31, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> On 03/07/23 18:30, Shuming [范書銘] wrote:
>>>>>> During ClockStop Mode0, peripheral interrupts are disabled.
>>>>> I can see that the interrupts are disabled in
>>>>> rt5682_dev_system_suspend(), which is NOT a mode where the clock stop
>>>>> is used... I don't think this commit message is correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> The IMPL_DEF interrupt which is used for jack detection is not
>>>>> disabled at all during any clock stop mode, and it shouldn't
>>>>> otherwise that would break the jack detection.
>>>> You are right. The commit message is wrong and not clear.
>>>> The situation is that the manager driver uses the clock stop mode0 to do
>>> system suspension.
>>>
>>> No it does not. The clock stop is ONLY used for pm_runtime, never for system
>>> suspend. We cannot go to system suspend with the link in clock-stop mode,
>>> that will create lots of issues, that's why we perform a full pm_runtime resume
>>> in the .prepare stage.
>> OK, I got your point. Thanks. However, this issue reported by AMD.
>> The AMD platform validated system level pm and runtime pm ops with the different modes.
>>
>> Hi Vijendar,
>> Do you have any comments?
> On AMD platforms, we are supporting two power modes.
> 1) Bus reset mode
> 2) Clock Stop Mode
>
> In Bus reset mode, bus will re-enumerate the peripheral devices
> whereas in ClockStop Mode, applying ClockStop Mode0
> in both pm ops (runtime pm ops and system level pm ops).
>
> Currently, SDCA interrupts are disabled on peripheral side, when system level
> suspend is invoked.
> For ClockStop mode SDW manager is not receiving any jack alert when
> SoundWire manager device is in D3 state.
That was precisely the point of clock stop mode: a peripheral can
restart the system even when it's in lower-power mode.
If there's no means to let a peripheral restart, the only benefit is
maybe to skip the enumeration time. That's not what the spec intended....
> Our expectation is when ClockStop Mode is selected, Only ClockStopMode0
> should be applied for system level suspend as well.
> We are not expecting bus reset.
>
> We have validated these changes on our platform with Clock stop mode.
> It's working fine.
>
>>>> The SdW device will not be re-attached when the system resume.
>>> it will re-attach, and in addition it will lose context because the manager
>>> performs a complete reset of the bus.
>>>
>>> So what's needed is to enable the interrupt, no matter what happened in the
>>> suspend transition.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-03 9:02 [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: rt5682-sdw: fix for JD event handling in ClockStop Mode0 shumingf
2023-07-03 10:17 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-03 11:11 ` Shuming [范書銘]
2023-07-03 12:25 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-03 13:00 ` Shuming [范書銘]
2023-07-03 13:31 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-07-03 14:20 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-07-03 14:46 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-07-03 14:45 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-03 15:18 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-07-03 17:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-04 6:36 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-07-04 7:11 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-04 7:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-07-04 8:27 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-07-04 9:03 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2023-07-04 9:14 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80c35e78-b82b-5d8a-bce7-fa8bb61e16cd@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=derek.fang@realtek.com \
--cc=flove@realtek.com \
--cc=jack.yu@realtek.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=oder_chiou@realtek.com \
--cc=shumingf@realtek.com \
--cc=vijendar.mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox