From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt565: fix missing assignment to ret_val
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 10:20:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81881453-1353-ecd8-c981-d1828738a996@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180502142945.31637-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On 5/2/18 9:29 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently, the check that ret_val is not -ENOENT is always true and
> the quirk bit BYT_RY5651_MCLK_EN is never being cleared because ret_val
> is always zero at this point from a previous assignment earlier on.
> I believe that ret_val should actually be assigned to the return from
> devm_clk_get() as this can return -ENOENT (from a deeper call to
> clk_get_sys) and that was the original intention to check this.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1460228 ("Logically dead code")
nice catch, the fix is consistent with what is done for rt5640.
Acked-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
>
> Fixes: 02c0a3b3047f ("ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5651: add MCLK, quirks and cleanups")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c
> index 3c7d93520c52..469e2695d121 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c
> @@ -856,9 +856,10 @@ static int snd_byt_rt5651_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (byt_rt5651_quirk & BYT_RT5651_MCLK_EN) {
> priv->mclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmc_plt_clk_3");
> if (IS_ERR(priv->mclk)) {
> + ret_val = PTR_ERR(priv->mclk);
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Failed to get MCLK from pmc_plt_clk_3: %ld\n",
> - PTR_ERR(priv->mclk));
> + "Failed to get MCLK from pmc_plt_clk_3: %d\n",
> + ret_val);
> /*
> * Fall back to bit clock usage for -ENOENT (clock not
> * available likely due to missing dependencies), bail
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-02 14:29 [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt565: fix missing assignment to ret_val Colin King
2018-05-02 15:20 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2018-05-03 1:32 ` Applied "ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt565: fix missing assignment to ret_val" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81881453-1353-ecd8-c981-d1828738a996@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).