From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: simple-card: cpu_dai_name creates
	confusion when DT case
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:31:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <87ob1r97td.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
References: <87eh2r9169.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
 <20140227050726.GR9383@sirena.org.uk>
 <87ios0etzw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
 <87ppm87z3i.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
 <20140228035357.GL9383@sirena.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (mail-pb0-f43.google.com
 [209.85.160.43])
 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2B7261A27
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:31:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id um1so223571pbc.16
 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:31:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140228035357.GL9383@sirena.org.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/options/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Simon <horms@verge.net.au>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org


Hi Mark

> > +	 * see
> > +	 *	fmt_single_name()
> > +	 *	fmt_multiple_name()
> > +	 */
> > +	dai_link->cpu_dai_name = NULL;
> > +
> 
> Why do this by overwriting rather than at the point where the variable
> gets assigned?

Do you mean why I did it end of asoc_simple_card_parse_of() ?
Because this cpu_dai_name itself is used for
dai_link->name, dai_link->stream_name;
This patch set NULL after that.