From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D867FC54E94 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 22:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30841A4C; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:04:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 30841A4C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1674597948; bh=ZHq8B2Hnd3lqzLjoIA1kbqbJqNYmrOFHMoVPDe/yQEo=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc:From; b=qUn/Rm7mUPmhUqEBJrcfjUyNR8PyIqcHxVq4SBkrxUAfCSp99MCABVRjLs4dKGbU9 51gYWIxjD3p/pop8ZJq+End8kMKSGQgB3yehxNQUbGe+fjJPHf30TCtcMtmZ5Ata02 K5H83s5xXVy/oeBWU2oY9HDvn5I+QnA9r8snEi3U= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31ABF8025D; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:04:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id ECFB1F801D5; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:04:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A4DF801D5 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:04:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 44A4DF801D5 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20201203 header.b=XhVGgJiG Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:73::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2B0399C; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 22:04:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net E2B0399C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1674597886; bh=b9wX+EPKF8LMzFlBp7moLL2r723CGwKnPFthU9QqeaM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XhVGgJiGradEM2ZdmLm0ziXiZEPA1MeFVU+3tHp6jyu+gAlPOiGWwuN5s6Hm0pR+j TL/q6elhIhsjnDNmkiPH5z0k9rCxg8/D72X5dQquBgT5TsbaKFOxqbp4ummxkKeAI9 2Y5LPFErpAMePR5Pu/so6zxaZxzaFIbefuTi6HnzlFhBQCnbMz9Z067NeZSDIEcwv8 QpGYd62dmeQ+iqHaoMub7/eCZZIsZTlWlJ2NdjkFpMzVvC25OhsDAe5FwQB/9xKqvN yo93VfmGm2NXuR9Sf2cVLKtVD7DhwwbvlcecbhotAT1e6YHlYL2hoTAMJpUHfjZMyf WLpZhnTc0AK5A== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Pierre-Louis Bossart , Takashi Iwai , SeongJae Park Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] Docs/sound/index: Add missing SPDX License Identifier In-Reply-To: <268823a3-f453-a38b-3fd7-500306675890@linux.intel.com> References: <20230122213650.187710-1-sj@kernel.org> <20230122213650.187710-9-sj@kernel.org> <875ycxr7qv.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <268823a3-f453-a38b-3fd7-500306675890@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:04:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87r0vjfv2a.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" Pierre-Louis Bossart writes: > On 1/23/23 02:10, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:36:50 +0100, >> SeongJae Park wrote: >>> >>> Add missing SPDX License Identifier for sound documentation index file. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park >> >> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai > > Isn't GPL-2.0 deprecated? It should be GPL-2.0-only, no? > > https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html > > https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html The kernel community hasn't really followed along with that change on the part of the SPDX folks; as far as I know, GPL-2.0 is considered to be just fine. There are currently more than twice as many GPL-2.0 declarations than GPL-2.0-only. Thanks, jon