From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda - program ICT bits to support HBR audio Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:12:36 -0500 Message-ID: <8af5af38-f220-f58a-e7be-4e25dfff452a@linux.intel.com> References: <20170919222505.28654-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290F02668BF for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:12:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Sriram Periyasamy , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org, "Subhransu S . Prusty" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 9/20/17 5:00 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:25:05 +0200, > Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> >> From: Sriram Periyasamy >> >> On recent Intel platforms (Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake, ApolloLake, >> KabyLake, ...), the IEC Coding Type (ICT) bitfield in the Digital >> Converter Control #3 needs to be set explicitly for HDMI/DisplayPort >> High Bit Rate (HBR) audio playback to work. This was not required in >> earlier platforms when HBR was first introduced. The ICT bits are >> defined in Section 7.3.3.9 of the HDaudio 1.0a specification. >> >> Since the ICT bitfield was not specified for HDAudio 1.0 devices >> (before 2009), we only program it on machines more recent than >> Haswell. >> >> We tested that this fix is not needed on Baytrail-I (MinnowBoard >> Turbot) and believe by extension it also does not apply to Braswell. >> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98797 >> >> Signed-off-by: Sriram Periyasamy >> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart >> Signed-off-by: Subhransu S. Prusty >> --- >> v2: move digi3 verb in Set section, only set ICT for haswell and newer > > Applied now with a slight fix (moving *_SET_* definition to the right > place). Thanks Takashi. Not sure what happened since I have a clear memory of doing that change and making a note of it...