Re: [Sound-open-firmware] [GIT PULL] SOF v1.3 firmware binaries

[Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 17:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I don't understand what you're suggesting nor how it would work
> > with the
> > way the kernel deals with directories. I tried to explain that we
> > need
> > an intel/sof-production and intel/sof directories, each with
> > generic
> > names that are symlinked to another location. This helps if you
> > want to
> > build quirks that select one or the other capabilities by just
> > changing
> > the firmware directory prefix. Pointers below.
> > 
> > https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/blob/9d7da69a1e85db2cdbbaae78dd7eda4eeaa1eb1c/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c#L24
> > 
> > https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/blob/9d7da69a1e85db2cdbbaae78dd7eda4eeaa1eb1c/sound/soc/sof/loader.c#L269
> > 
> > https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/blob/9d7da69a1e85db2cdbbaae78dd7eda4eeaa1eb1c/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c#L149

So the commit did support this, but it would put all "production"
signed binaries at the intel/sof/ level via soft links (to be
automatically loaded by the driver as the default).

A subsequent commit would have added the community signed images. I
planned to link community signed binaries at the intel/sof/community
level since most users would use the production signed images by
default (and would not need to use a module param to select). My
assumption was that machines using community signed by default would
have this in their default_fw_path ?

> > 
> > I guess we need to talk off-line since we are evidently not on the
> > same
> > page or something is missing for people to use this pull request.
> 
> I suggest you guys do that.  At the moment, I'm not pulling anything
> related to this until it has a signoff from both you and Liam in the
> commit logs at a minimum.

Yep, no problem - Pierre and I will refine and resend shortly. I also
need to remove links for aliases.

Thanks

Liam