From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pl bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: add support for disabling period irq Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 07:57:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1288649573-31545-1-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA38244F7 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:57:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so7780521iwn.38 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:57:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org >>> >>> #define SNDRV_PCM_INFO_NO_PERIOD_ACK =A0 =A00x00800000 =A0 =A0 =A0/* pe= riod >>> transfer acknowledge can be disabled */ >> >> How about "period update"? >> I don't mind much how it's called, though... > > ACK is smaller, but anything else than IRQ or INTERRUPT sounds good to me. Anybody against WAKEUP?