From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v5][resend v4] of: replace Asahi Kasei Corp vendor prefix Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 07:46:16 -0600 Message-ID: References: <878ulzx6hr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com> <20140922130026.GK3290@leverpostej> <20140922132743.GM3290@leverpostej> <87y4rfhmgl.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <1415845309.4269.6.camel@perches.com> <20141113025105.GA16652@verge.net.au> <87vbmjhj00.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20141113110740.GE3815@sirena.org.uk> <87k32yd0bd.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <20141114093554.GC3810@ulmo> <87y4ra8xac.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <5469CD47.3040409@cogentembedded.com> <877fytxsde.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87egsob2cl.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <5478603D.1080404@cogentembedded.com> <87d282sl6w.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87lhm7t37l.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87egr4vcxu.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <54AF5AB0.2050208@wwwdotorg.org> <871tn4uv0j.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <871tn4uv0j.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Stephen Warren , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , Matthias Brugger , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , SH-Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Linus Torvalds , Mark Brown , ALSA Development Mailing List , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Simon Horman , Geert Uytterhoeven List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Stephen > > Thank you for your feedback > >> > I'm sending this "of: replace Asahi Kasei Corp vendor prefix" during >> > half-year (since Jun 2014) , many times. But, no-one care it. >> > I don't know who is the best maintainer. >> > - Stephen : because it has Tegra ? >> > - Olof : because it has Tegra (= ARM) ? >> > - Arnd : because it has Tegra (= ARM) ? >> > - Matthias: because it has Tegra (= ARM SoC) ? >> > - Rob : because DT ? >> > - Andrew : Last chance ? >> > >> > But, could you please care this patch ? >> > I will re-send it again >> >> It doesn't seem to be ack'd by any of the DT maintainers. Retro-actively >> changing a DT vendor name would need that, I think. > > Rob ? > I had sent this patch to him since half-years ago, many times... > Or other maintainer ? > >> Thierry and Alex (both Tegra maintainers) appear to have ack'd it, so it >> seems they expect it to go through some tree other than Tegra. Weren't >> there a bunch of related patches along with this (e.g. updating relevant >> drivers to support both prefixes?) so it was expected this patch would >> be applied together with them? > > I guess they expected it goes to DT branch (?) > This is only 1 patch. it doesn't have related patch-set It is in my queue. If the users of it are fine with breaking things, who am I to argue with them. Rob