From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA160FA3741 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3453165E; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 22:54:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz E3453165E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1667253350; bh=FFGfPDLkVcZktYz3pbO3mrkBD87ZdMPNLu3yTzjFccQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=kad7GVcU5sKvK72vxAadM8Z8c110KkCj4IwYWBabohSLSP904R1ax5yqV9q1cJHhB Vy7YujfgnoJztmNqKAJXb8Avfamyp3q5CHh9kKGXRBPUylMeJsjBlzgbkYKTzApwOt Y/iBBQcWk40x89UwiaunGdx28G2IlvQtXUl2jgnQ= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8586BF800F3; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 22:54:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 393CCF80163; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 22:54:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3174F800F3 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 22:54:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz E3174F800F3 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eC9YoqyK" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D33861495; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BFD4C433C1; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:54:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667253288; bh=FFGfPDLkVcZktYz3pbO3mrkBD87ZdMPNLu3yTzjFccQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eC9YoqyK9Z2EZNl8+LOIP2tPNeif2YkEHO582v1NBPTulTQ39gL4j+++ChjpL5+fd 7A634MKLAiNtOFyZ1M11DPfpG12e2srIabQjIeDwSs7+BryxISsYKxzd9Oa6GVLo9R nMn3Er8nIIaLKLoqSTd4vsgkq1o0p4OcbfzYr+VIMz+dw+RUSdCkvV6cZT3L+WygqC Dpoq6UlhPal/EHREY0tPPxIODSQ0GVg80JNuQDG4dMAABNh9dVZyrgi050JrnzuZKs 7faXojMJZQsTjeSU5bBy5jWRfHIm4oDQkQOLlGqA3SkLdqykNRkVo5QE/D/O32VfCQ vezhYyhZiIngA== Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:54:42 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=EDcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E?= Prado Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ASoC: rt5682: Support dbvdd and ldo1-in supplies Message-ID: References: <20221028205540.3197304-1-nfraprado@collabora.com> <20221028205540.3197304-7-nfraprado@collabora.com> <20221031163140.h63kjpivwg7xpvs3@notapiano> <20221031190938.GA3264845-robh@kernel.org> <20221031193810.vdsdndr4ltvhrfel@notapiano> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pxMlgxtl57zbllW0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221031193810.vdsdndr4ltvhrfel@notapiano> X-Cookie: Are you still an ALCOHOLIC? Cc: Oder Chiou , Rob Herring , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , kernel@collabora.com, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --pxMlgxtl57zbllW0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 03:38:10PM -0400, N=EDcolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > We could have both if we converted the existing ones to lowercase first, = but as > I mentioned in [1] this requires using devm_regulator_get_optional() befo= re > falling back, which seemed like an abuse of that API and to unnecessarily > complicate the code. Yeah, it's definitely not what the ABI is for and probably more trouble than it's worth. We *could* probably write some helpers that handle legacy supply names to the regulator core code if someone really wanted to retire old names, that way the complication would be shared between users which seems more managable but someone would still need the time and enthusiasm to write the code. --pxMlgxtl57zbllW0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmNgRCEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9ClYQf9FsCx0G+N6VTpjGeY5nkPr29CUIIugDCl4wTHz+wFi7U/VdaIbjstqF9y 2laVvOENRoq28dcIG1adZWcTZtDflCRfS72W1e7x/p/6eg5Syl1S96YZqYAmh+H+ DuZ6it8zFCiTO3emtcLI8ZxK89TFdBebgo5R3g63lvmcfIhvk3A6u/vYxCJCvRVo oDk5tB/cWSTC3qX+dU9a4aFpqjsecHmhnmE0nqLLYpyMxDQtTvmsyvWh2dcqbQi6 kJkRByMxqmsbgYCjUec0FDkuIvbeb0Up1apSK4Ui+lb+wtYqExcfcEcuA7LgbtpG gTSTYSGcZLpFBepWyyoyqYODwJssDA== =DG1t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pxMlgxtl57zbllW0--