From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC88C2B9F8 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD8E61284 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:45:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EFD8E61284 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8AA1732; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:45:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 6B8AA1732 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1621953952; bh=NJdUar8af0rdZYBLwdPudA7NpymLsCZxH70tBGhysbc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=pqLhnfg8NwibRdAI+/HnwRcM2efk7e6P9uijgLt4aZt+zVjRn4dI+hG0E0eOyc9PR xuhSjISJYYayw2spQJYCoUue9F5nwDHQPllKetxxdlPMGv0mLgGGuPAx4VoCBZFkUv XOLxnrBUtl6cmr5PhJrmJBoClSZub2xNHxdtBf6M= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C0DF800F9; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:44:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 9EF1BF800FA; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E26F800F7 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:44:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 66E26F800F7 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="2kKHVtuP" Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1C9C61284; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:44:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1621953859; bh=NJdUar8af0rdZYBLwdPudA7NpymLsCZxH70tBGhysbc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2kKHVtuPcKdBu8+eEcJTppd47tQR4i/DIUwvrkzHptaah21baBrjuoVqKn5IzbP4h PXM3ew0KIW4KO1L38va50OfU9kxMI0n/mdwy7ygCB9p+Ewblsa6QycIYJffOiQzGp+ trfPiuPrrOiadUanaAWsWpgeUUcx8cZfygolx2c0= Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:44:17 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 30/63] ASoC: rt5645: add error checking to rt5645_probe function Message-ID: References: <20210524144620.2497249-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20210524144620.2497249-30-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Sasha Levin , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Potter X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:01:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:45:47AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > From: Phillip Potter > > > > [ Upstream commit 5e70b8e22b64eed13d5bbebcb5911dae65bf8c6b ] > > > > Check for return value from various snd_soc_dapm_* calls, as many of > > them can return errors and this should be handled. Also, reintroduce > > the allocation failure check for rt5645->eq_param as well. Make all > > I also don't have this commit and can't see any sign of it > having been submitted upstream. I cc:ed you on it, as it was part of the larger "revert the umn.edu" mess. It's now in 5.13-rc3. thanks, greg k-h